DVL Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 Any help would be appreciated. I'm not getting my hopes up but those regmaglypt-like pits have me intrigued Weak attraction to magnetPits on all but one side (one side smooth)No vesiclesDark exterior/lighter InteriorRust spotsPossible tiny, dark amber colored crystals visible with hand microscopeBrownish gray streak at first; then gray streak from interiorGray powder from interior attracted to magnetVolcanic activity nearby- basalts and other magnetic rocks in areaPlain Interior-strong resemblance to gabbros; haven't found any chondrules or metal flecks as far as I can tell-although entire window does shine at certain angle.Specific Gravity 2.86- if I remember correctly- based on the water bucket testFound partially submerged in pool adjacent to river bed Thanks for looking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regmaglitch Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Hi DVL, Firstly, welcome to this forum. Thank you for posting the photos of your find. It does have a differentsurface, but not what I would call regmaglypts. Also, the interior color is very close to the exterior color, butno visible metal blebs or chondrules. The interior shouldn't have a streak at all. It doesn't look like ameteorite to me, but it is an interesting igneous rock. The fact that you noticed the surface features, andtook a close look, means you have a good eye for hunting meteorites. We all find our share of meteor-wrongs.Keep on hunting, the next one may be the real deal. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVL Posted December 28, 2015 Author Share Posted December 28, 2015 Thank you Ben,I appreciate your reply. One correction though, not that it matters, the interior does not leave a streak. Only the exterior. Didn't mean to type that. Regarding the surface, there are some stones out there that are very similar:http://meteoritegallery.com/matamoros-h6/http://geosurvey.ohiodnr.gov/portals/geosurvey/AstroGeology/Meteorites/NewConcord_big.jpgI agree though that it's more likely terrestrial-basalt probably (or gabbro?). I'll grind a bit more and post if I find anything. If not, still an interesting "wrong."Thanks again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.