Nugget Shooter 4,614 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Found in the good old USA!http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100830/ap_on_re_us/us_carolina_emerald Quote Link to post Share on other sites
garimpo 2,295 Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I could conger up some stress if I had something like that to relieve it...a lot of Emerald mines less than 100 miles from here... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goldfinger 43 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 That's gorgeous and one of the best I've ever seen that came from the US. It reminds me of the emeralds from Muzo.Some of you may recall seeing a story on TV about a commercial emerald mine in NC. This guy waited for years to buy this property and did so when it became available. This mine is in the same area where that gorgeous specimen was found. http://www.northcarolinaemeralds.info/HiddeniteDistrict/NAEMMine/NAEM.htmSteve Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigrex 60 Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Here's another link on the recent find from that same site about NC emerald, apparently they are calling it the Adams Mine:http://www.northcarolinaemeralds.info/HiddeniteDistrict/AdamsMine/Adams.htm Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nugget Shooter 4,614 Posted September 2, 2010 Author Share Posted September 2, 2010 Here's another link on the recent find from that same site about NC emerald, apparently they are calling it the Adams Mine:http://www.northcarolinaemeralds.info/HiddeniteDistrict/AdamsMine/Adams.htmHey Rex,Got the original info I posted from your post that showed up on my Face Book page... :ph34r2: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigrex 60 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 Hey Rex,Got the original info I posted from your post that showed up on my Face Book page... :ph34r2:That's fine, I also repost informative info. folks share here and place it on my facebook page all the time. :spinnin: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goldfinger 43 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 I think there's a little confusion. The rough stone in the photo weighs 310 carats. The cut stone weighs 65 carats.That's one heck of a loss. Perhaps there's some smaller pieces from the larger stone they can facet..Steve Quote Link to post Share on other sites
El Dorado 964 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 The picture of the finished stone was disappointing... looks to have been cut by a beginner. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Au Seeker 3,153 Posted September 3, 2010 Share Posted September 3, 2010 The picture of the finished stone was disappointing... looks to have been cut by a beginner. I was thinking the same thing when I saw it on another website, you would think that this emerald being as rare as it is for this part of the world that they would've had the best to cut it, probably one of the people at the gem shop on the property cut it!!!:unsure: Skip Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigrex 60 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 Well, the rule of thumb for faceting is that you retain about 1/3 of the original weight, emeralds tend to have lots of inclusions, so that may be accurate, 1/3 of 310 carats is 93 carats. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goldfinger 43 Posted September 4, 2010 Share Posted September 4, 2010 I was thinking the same thing when I saw it on another website, you would think that this emerald being as rare as it is for this part of the world that they would've had the best to cut it, probably one of the people at the gem shop on the property cut it!!!:unsure: SkipI'd like to think they took a little time finding an expert for faceting that stone. Surely they wouldn't have hired an amateur,given the value of the rough. It's probably just a bad picture... :twocents: Steve Quote Link to post Share on other sites
adam 3,127 Posted September 5, 2010 Share Posted September 5, 2010 The emerald should have been left as is. Personally, I would have never had it cut. The Smithsonian could have displayed it as a natural stone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goldfinger 43 Posted September 6, 2010 Share Posted September 6, 2010 The emerald should have been left as is. Personally, I would have never had it cut. The Smithsonian could have displayed it as a natural stone.And I agree with you but they probably didn't have the funds to buy it.Steve Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Buckshot 0 Posted December 30, 2010 Share Posted December 30, 2010 Here's another link on the recent find from that same site about NC emerald, apparently they are calling it the Adams Mine:http://www.northcarolinaemeralds.info/HiddeniteDistrict/AdamsMine/Adams.htm Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Buckshot 0 Posted December 30, 2010 Share Posted December 30, 2010 Big Rex: Just noted this earlier post on the emerald Terry Ledford found, Terry operated a gem shop at Little Switzerland near Spruce Pine, NC and had one for a short time here in Marion, NC, talked to him a few times in the past. Mr. Red Reitzel who had found the large emerald I think in 1971 at this location which went to the Smithsonian is a friend. I took him trout fishing a couple or three years back. He frequents a local gold mining operation from time to time and loves to fish, his arthritis makes it difficult for him to do what he wants to, however a couple of years back he cut a smokey quartz stone for me.Buckshot Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.