Odinxgen

The interior has become sand that I have kept and will always keep. I've not wasted this but controlled it and am amazed by this stone. The exterior is quite fused and all fragments survive and held by many people here in Winnipeg.

Higher quality photos of the stone. Yeah IDK nobody takes this idea seriously and how can I argue proof if vital I mean key details are simply brushed aside. I'm done with this and pursuing future expeditions that are more prepared. I'm glad that cooler minds prevail I feel blessed in this work I've done truly and I 80% stand behind my assertions here and elsewhere. I've made a few errors but these things are ultimately ironed out in the bigger picture. -odin

Yeah many times, heres another interesting clue. This stones crust if rubbed on porcelain is a very earthy brown, but the interior is clear streak color and the dust from streaking is grey.

To be fair I can see this stone is white. But not the same kind of white, this sandstone has patches of translucent sandgrains that lost their color, they appear white but a very very clean and attractive white, this is very dissimilar fireball IMO fireball -Odin

Lets see this iron in sandstone. how the heck does a guy find a nickel test anyway. Mars has nickel that would put this whole thread to bed right?

I'm the guy that is convinced that the research ive read is pointing to me finding a Martian sandstone. That is all, also I love rocks man.

My background is unrelated except, I grew up in the badlands of Drumheller Alberta, was exploring early on and became interested in meteorites at 15. I'm 26 now and Ive been on about four hunts all amazing all fruitless or wrongs but that's just how things are. This stone came from my most recent hunt to the Manitoba Meteorite hotspot. it's a real place and probably the only place in the world one could just stumble on this kinda thing several unrecovered recentish falls and two ancient glaciers colliding along the border Coupled with the finds which if you locate them on google earth are in a

WillM: I appreciate your comment, I have spoken about the similarities in this stone and the ones found in Sweden that are now unfortunately a dead horse. That's pretty clever for you to have connected those stones to this research. As you can see the community in general scoffs at the idea of sedimentary meteorites. Facts are facts and I see these forum members posting all the time saying "No matter how much you wish for you're stone to be a meteorite, it is what it is." This statement is wildly ironic to me, Because now when the facts are presented opposing their opinion they

Lol bye felica!

Im blocking bedrock for his comments and will not be responding to his posts unless they are brought to my attention. Thank you to the people PMing me, you guys are great and may continue to do so!

Bedrock bob, I seen your post and wanted to respond in kind, you can say it's a sandstone... Because it is a sandstone. It IS also a meteorite. I don't think you understand complex ideas and you look like the type of guy that likes to dress up in camo and pretend to be a survivalist. And while I can understand how someone like you can remain completely oblivious to the facts, because they demand research that someone like you won't have the capacity to understand. I hope you feel good saying all of these things to me, I've saved all of these pages and will continue to revi

That is the cone IE the face of the orientation it likely had, this structure is a higher grade of metamorphose and is heavier than some other sides even though it is smaller. Lol but your post is dripping with sarcasm and I promise you that joining in with these experts you are going to be humiliated. I've saved all of this and I can hold a grudge for a very long time. -Odin

Fred, it's a meme. You have nothing to say, Where are your arguments against what I just said. If you don't have solid answers to these questions then simply don't post here. The geologists here can't answer them but at least they are able to admit i'm not wrong about these observations. You have 0 knowledge about this topic and that's my point. I don't care what your opinion is. I want real, scientific answers that I can prove, and demonstrate so that I can continue to connect these dots that were not already connected. These traits are unified around this stone but I am standing on the

As usual no response to the facts, I don't need your fricking sympathy. I'm surviving, and I'll get by right or wrong but I know Im right, and I will go to whatever length I need to to prove it even paying $2000 I don't have for the lab testing. If i'm wrong you can all get a laugh at the guy who had the audacity to think he may have found a sandstone meteorite and reach out to meteorite hunters for help.

Fred, do you know anything about the theoretical class of meteorites? I'm talking about sed-types. If you do please list the traits these meteorites should have and compare that with everything I've said. Just because this would blow your fricking mind if it was true does NOT make it impossible, and in fact the further I get into the research, the more I learn about them. The more this stone sings meteorite. Yeah it's a sandstone, and a sandstone I a sandstone. But let's talk about the obvious crust, which is not weather rind, Not even similar. Or The obvious imprinting. Or the compl